Monday, March 4, 2013
Moving to a New Location
And, we're back. True to their word, the zombies have returned control of the horizontal, the vertical, and everything back to me. These were hard-working zombies. And, all they consumed were a few hamburgers. A little on the rare side, though.
As of this writing, we are transferring helm control over to my blog's new location at:
http://multimediameditations.com/
All previous posts and comments will reside over there, and all writings from now on will be at the new location. It's been fun here with Blogger, and I've enjoyed it, but it's time to move on.
I now transfer control from here....
Monday, February 18, 2013
Zombies Have Taken Over
We interrupt this blog for a few words from our sponsors.
Zombies have been sighted recently, and they want to revamp the site. Don’t
know if a revamp is the same as a vamp or even a vampire, or why the zombies
should care, but they are holding the site hostage until I make some changes.
Please stay tuned for further developments.
The zombies inform me the site will be back in operation in
two weeks. And, if we believe the zombies, that will be March 4th, 2013.
'til next time... Adios.
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Monkeying Around
Let's
have a look-see at the Monkey List, shall we? I'm beginning to see
just how needed this list is. There's no comprehensive Monkey
Catalog out there that I can find. That can't be. We must know our
monkeys!
'til next time... Adios.
Not
sure yet how best to organize the Monkey List. For the moment, I'll
just throw it in a post, unless it gets too bulky.
Oh,
and a hearty Monkey Thank You to my readers out there who have
contributed their monkey suggestions. Here
we go:
The
Ape Man (1943) -- Bela Lugosi as Dr. James Brewster, a
not-really-mad-but-slightly-peevish scientist who gets bored and
decides to turn himself into a monkey. Doc Brewster shares living
space in a cage with an actual ape played by gorilla actor Emil Van
Horn. There's Mayhem! There's Murder! And, there's Monkey
Business!
King
Kong (1933) -- The most famous of the monkey movies.
Planet
of the Apes (1968) -- "Human see, human do."
2001:
A Space Odyssey (1968) -- Wonder if the ape actors in 2001 also got
work in Planet of the Apes?
Planet
of the Apes (2001) -- Good the first time around, not so good the
second.
Bedtime
for Bonzo (1951) -- Who learned from who?
Mighty
Joe Young (1949) -- King Kong lite. Who hasn't wanted his or her
own big monkey as a friend? Irene "Granny" Ryan has a bit
part.
Mighty
Joe Young (1998) -- Hollywood's remake fever. Same story, more
effects.
Space
Chimps (2008) -- According to IMDb, a team of astronaut chimps must
rid "...a far-away planet of their nefarious leader." I
love anything that has the word 'nefarious' describing it.
Son
of Kong (1933) -- Carl Denham is back from King Kong, but without Fay
Wray. The King's son, a chimp off the old block (I have no shame), monkeys around.
Kingu Kongu tai Gojira -- King
Kong vs. Godzilla (1962) -- The Toho Company and RKO join forces to
pit Big Green and the Big Ape against each other in a
knockdown-dragout.
That's
about all the monkeying around I have time for tonight. I will leave
everyone with this question, though. Have there been any zombie
monkey movies? Zombies. Monkeys. Seems like a great combo.
'til next time... Adios.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Resistance is Futile
Got
to love this new age of tech. An era when we can have near-immediate
access to videos and audio of a huge chunk of space rock blasting
through the atmosphere, and also get updates on fake zombies via the
hacked Emergency Broadcast System.
'til next time... Adios.
Oh,
yeah, and let's not forget the Poop Ship.
Makes
me wonder what's gonna happen next. Alien landings, perhaps?
That's
all I have for tonight. Stay tuned tomorrow. More stuff on its way.
'til next time... Adios.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Weather R Us
I love watching the Weather Channel People when there’s the
possibility, no matter how remote, of some sort of Event. They’re
like kittens out there, playing in the snow. Except there’s no
snow. Yet. But, they assure us there will be, standing out there, all
dressed alike in their L. L. Bean jackets, with their little designer
rulers and yardsticks.
It wasn't always like this, though.
Once upon a time, many ages ago before The Weather Channel, we had to turn to each other for weather entertainment. “What about that big storm last night, huh, Bert?” “Yep, sure was a big one.” “Uh huh, sure was.” It’s a wonder we ever got out of bed every morning. There was no drama, no excitement, and no fun. But not anymore. No sirree. With TWC (I’m going ahead and acronyming – the term for changing a perfectly functional and descriptive name to an annoyingly vague abbreviation – The Weather Channel, to stay ahead of the curve, following the examples of TLC (formerly known as The Learning Channel)), if there’s no exciting weather, they’ll whip some up.
'til next time... Adios.
It wasn't always like this, though.
Once upon a time, many ages ago before The Weather Channel, we had to turn to each other for weather entertainment. “What about that big storm last night, huh, Bert?” “Yep, sure was a big one.” “Uh huh, sure was.” It’s a wonder we ever got out of bed every morning. There was no drama, no excitement, and no fun. But not anymore. No sirree. With TWC (I’m going ahead and acronyming – the term for changing a perfectly functional and descriptive name to an annoyingly vague abbreviation – The Weather Channel, to stay ahead of the curve, following the examples of TLC (formerly known as The Learning Channel)), if there’s no exciting weather, they’ll whip some up.
Here's what happened.
At some point, they thought, “Huh!
We’re all out here, all excited for some really nasty weather, and
nothing’s happening.” That's when they saw the future. “Hey, so
what if nothing’s happening now. We can talk about what would
happen IF…..” And, thus, was born, weather fiction.
(... to be continued)
'til next time... Adios.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Stupid Tech Tricks
Okay, they made this one easy for me. You’ve heard the old
saying about turkeys standing in the rain and drowning. Well…
that’s a perfect lead-in to a new piece of tech, or rather, a tech
accessory, called the Brolly.
First things first, though. The name itself, Brolly, already sounds like something a first-grader would come up with. The thing looks like a set of brass knuckles, and it's designed to let you hold your umbrella and text at the same time. In the rain.
Now, I think this is just a wondrous idea. I mean, first thing I think of when I’m standing in the middle of a rainstorm with the wind whipping around the umbrella is, "Man, I sure do wish I had a way of holding onto my umbrella so I could text, too. And, then, maybe someone will make a force field, too, that would protect me from oncoming traffic as I stumble rain-blinded and text-addled into the street."
I figure what's coming next on the tech superhighway is an accessory that attaches your i-Thingy to your steering wheel’s airbag. It'll be called In Your Face. That way, when you’re in a head-on collision, you can bang out a text as the airbag explodes. I hear they’re also working on one for commercial airline pilots. “This is your captain texting. LOL.”
A friend of mine came up with another add-on for the Brolly. For ultimate practicality, connect the umbrella to the iPhone and use the umbrella as an antenna for better reception. Also, it could double as a charger for your phone when you’re struck by lightning. Talk about re-usability.
Actually, I’m thinking about taking out a cheap life insurance policy on anyone who buys one of these things. That way, I won’t have to pay much on the premium. I’ll just count on volume. I figure that after a short period of time, they’ll all be entrants in the Darwin Awards.
http://www.gizmag.com/brolly-text-friendly-umbrella/26011/
First things first, though. The name itself, Brolly, already sounds like something a first-grader would come up with. The thing looks like a set of brass knuckles, and it's designed to let you hold your umbrella and text at the same time. In the rain.
Now, I think this is just a wondrous idea. I mean, first thing I think of when I’m standing in the middle of a rainstorm with the wind whipping around the umbrella is, "Man, I sure do wish I had a way of holding onto my umbrella so I could text, too. And, then, maybe someone will make a force field, too, that would protect me from oncoming traffic as I stumble rain-blinded and text-addled into the street."
I figure what's coming next on the tech superhighway is an accessory that attaches your i-Thingy to your steering wheel’s airbag. It'll be called In Your Face. That way, when you’re in a head-on collision, you can bang out a text as the airbag explodes. I hear they’re also working on one for commercial airline pilots. “This is your captain texting. LOL.”
A friend of mine came up with another add-on for the Brolly. For ultimate practicality, connect the umbrella to the iPhone and use the umbrella as an antenna for better reception. Also, it could double as a charger for your phone when you’re struck by lightning. Talk about re-usability.
Actually, I’m thinking about taking out a cheap life insurance policy on anyone who buys one of these things. That way, I won’t have to pay much on the premium. I’ll just count on volume. I figure that after a short period of time, they’ll all be entrants in the Darwin Awards.
http://www.gizmag.com/brolly-text-friendly-umbrella/26011/
'til next time... Adios.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Star Spats Part Two-o
(continued from yesterday's post -- Battle Beyond the Stars)
Ah, good ol’ reliable Roger Corman. The cheesemeister himself, whompin' up a cheese casserole.
This movie has it all. Androids. Bad guys. Spaceships. Really bad laser weapon effects. It’s even got a Valkyrie. Oh, yeah, and a cowboy. A space cowboy, no less, played by George Peppard. But, somewhere across the galaxy, he lost his accent, so he sounds like a cowboy from the western fields of Illinois.
All the characters are a patchwork quilt of other characters we’ve seen in other films. They lifted the Robert Vaughn character, Gelt, straight from The Magnificent Seven, where he played the gunfighter-on-the-run, Lee. He also had a smidgen of the Charles Bronson character from Seven thrown in, too. But, the two most bizarre characters had to be that of Peppard as Cowboy (a Han Solo-like character), and Sybil Danning as St. Exmin, a Valkyrie, complete with foam rubber helmet. In the back of my mind I'm hearing Bugs Bunny music -- "Kill de wabbit, kill de wabbit!"
Richard Thomas as Shad (gotta love the characters' names in this souffle) the farmer plays a cross between Luke Skywalker and also a composite of the Mexican villagers in The Magnificent Seven going off to hire the mercenaries. He meets a young woman while on his quest whose father (played by veteran character actor Sam Jaffe), who has a head but a robot body, wants her to procreate with Shad (not enough room or time here to go into that). She's never seen other humans before, other than her father, the robot, so she runs off with Shad. This part is pure Forbidden Planet (1956).
And, the list goes on. The exterior spaceship shots are not too bad, pure Star Wars sequences; sound effects made me think of every late-70's early-80's video game I ever played, with some machine gun sounds for Cowboy's laser (?); the laser effects, well, they really didn't spend much there; and John Saxon as Sador, the bad guy, sported a facial tattoo, that looked really similar to Eric Bana's Nero character in 2009's Star Trek reboot.
All-in-all, it's an absolute hoot. I wouldn't spend much on it, but it's fun just seeing some bad post-Star Wars effects.
Ah, good ol’ reliable Roger Corman. The cheesemeister himself, whompin' up a cheese casserole.
This movie has it all. Androids. Bad guys. Spaceships. Really bad laser weapon effects. It’s even got a Valkyrie. Oh, yeah, and a cowboy. A space cowboy, no less, played by George Peppard. But, somewhere across the galaxy, he lost his accent, so he sounds like a cowboy from the western fields of Illinois.
All the characters are a patchwork quilt of other characters we’ve seen in other films. They lifted the Robert Vaughn character, Gelt, straight from The Magnificent Seven, where he played the gunfighter-on-the-run, Lee. He also had a smidgen of the Charles Bronson character from Seven thrown in, too. But, the two most bizarre characters had to be that of Peppard as Cowboy (a Han Solo-like character), and Sybil Danning as St. Exmin, a Valkyrie, complete with foam rubber helmet. In the back of my mind I'm hearing Bugs Bunny music -- "Kill de wabbit, kill de wabbit!"
Richard Thomas as Shad (gotta love the characters' names in this souffle) the farmer plays a cross between Luke Skywalker and also a composite of the Mexican villagers in The Magnificent Seven going off to hire the mercenaries. He meets a young woman while on his quest whose father (played by veteran character actor Sam Jaffe), who has a head but a robot body, wants her to procreate with Shad (not enough room or time here to go into that). She's never seen other humans before, other than her father, the robot, so she runs off with Shad. This part is pure Forbidden Planet (1956).
And, the list goes on. The exterior spaceship shots are not too bad, pure Star Wars sequences; sound effects made me think of every late-70's early-80's video game I ever played, with some machine gun sounds for Cowboy's laser (?); the laser effects, well, they really didn't spend much there; and John Saxon as Sador, the bad guy, sported a facial tattoo, that looked really similar to Eric Bana's Nero character in 2009's Star Trek reboot.
All-in-all, it's an absolute hoot. I wouldn't spend much on it, but it's fun just seeing some bad post-Star Wars effects.
'til next time... Adios.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Star Spats
1980. Three years after the original
Star Wars (1977) blasted onto the scene, and the knock-offs were coming from
everywhere. We had Battlestar Galactica (1978), Galactica 1980 (1980
-- what a coincidence... that's also part of the title. Talk about creative.), and some clones from overseas, especially
Italy and Japan. But, one of the cheesiest, and most entertaining
had to be Roger Corman's production Battle Beyond the Stars (1980).
'til next time... Adios.
Sliced directly from The Magnificent
Seven (1960), but also with parts of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968),
Star Wars, Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979), and perhaps
some of George Lucas's THX-1138 (1971) thrown into the mix, it tells
the space-western tale of a peaceful planet threatened with
destruction by John Saxon. And, so, Richard "John Boy"
Thomas must seek out seven laser-totin' hired guns to take care of
the baddies. Nah, they didn't take this from The Magnificent Seven
at all.
Got started on this one too late
tonight. More tomorrow. It's way too much fun.
'til next time... Adios.
Friday, February 8, 2013
Random Misfirings of Neurons
So, I’m sitting here watching everyone on The Weather Channel
get all excited about the possible snowfall of historic significance
roll up the East Coast. It’s a little sad, though, watching them in
their L. L. Bean jackets, carrying their little rulers or yardsticks,
waiting/hoping for a massive amount of snow.
I’ve got the sound down on the TV and I’m listening to some jazz from Wiesbaden. I don’t know. It’s just the way my mind works.
Anyway, I got to thinking about the Rat Pack and the Brat Pack.
The Rat Pack, or at least the ones most of us recall in their 1960’s incarnation, consisted of Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis, Jr., Joey Bishop, and Peter Lawford, with the main guys being the first three. All those guys stayed active in one venue or another, singing, acting, some kind of performing, pretty much all their lives.
But, what about the Brat Pack?
The core members of the second generation were – Emilio Estevez, Anthony Michael Hall, Rob Lowe, Andrew McCarthy, Demi Moore, Judd Nelson, Molly Ringwald, and Ally Sheedy. All actors who emerged in the 80’s, primarily in movies such as St. Elmo’s Fire (1985) and The Breakfast Club (1985). So, where are they now?
A few are still around, but many couldn’t quite maintain their 1980’s Power Years. A lot got stuck there in that time period, because that’s how, unfortunately, we still see them, unless they reinvented themselves.
'til next time... Adios.
I’ve got the sound down on the TV and I’m listening to some jazz from Wiesbaden. I don’t know. It’s just the way my mind works.
Anyway, I got to thinking about the Rat Pack and the Brat Pack.
The Rat Pack, or at least the ones most of us recall in their 1960’s incarnation, consisted of Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis, Jr., Joey Bishop, and Peter Lawford, with the main guys being the first three. All those guys stayed active in one venue or another, singing, acting, some kind of performing, pretty much all their lives.
But, what about the Brat Pack?
The core members of the second generation were – Emilio Estevez, Anthony Michael Hall, Rob Lowe, Andrew McCarthy, Demi Moore, Judd Nelson, Molly Ringwald, and Ally Sheedy. All actors who emerged in the 80’s, primarily in movies such as St. Elmo’s Fire (1985) and The Breakfast Club (1985). So, where are they now?
A few are still around, but many couldn’t quite maintain their 1980’s Power Years. A lot got stuck there in that time period, because that’s how, unfortunately, we still see them, unless they reinvented themselves.
Looks like Anthony Michael Hall is
active, as is Rob Lowe. Emilio's working some, just not as steady as
in the past. I really miss him. Liked his take on Billy the Kid way
back when in Young Guns (1988). Andrew McCarthy's still working,
with one movie currently in post-production, another in
pre-production. Demi's active, but the last thing memorable I saw
her in was G. I. Jane (1997). Judd Nelson's working, just not in anything
I've seen him in. Molly Ringwald is getting regular TV work. And,
Ally Sheedy's been working some, just not as much as in the past.
What would be fun is a Brat Pack
Reunion. Before we all get too old. But, what's needed is one with
a different spin. Not a weepy melodrama. Needs to be a comedy. At
any rate, I'd like to see them gathered together again.
Well, I've rambled enough for today.
One more check on The Weather Channel before closing, though. Got to
wonder if they're pushing the snow show a little hard. Interesting
they're Tracking Nemo. More like Finding Nemo, as in, where is it?
Yeah, they've got some snow, but hey, it's the Northeast.
I'm outta here.
'til next time... Adios.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Romero. George Romero.
2 days ago, on February 4th, George Romero celebrated
his 74th birthday. Wonder if he celebrated by drinking a
zombie (three different kinds of rum, assorted fruit juices…)?
He reminds of Stan Lee a bit, but younger, and is the undisputed father of people-munchin’ zombies, beginning with his classic, Night of the Living Dead in 1968, shot on a budget of somewhere around $100,000.
I’ve only seen two or three of his Dead series. I know Night of the Living Dead had slow zombies. Wonder if he sped ‘em up later on? Perhaps he knows what got them moving so fast in later years.
His most recent film, a documentary titled Into the Dark: Exploring the Horror Film, is supposedly in post-production, with Mr. Romero as executive producer. This one I definitely want to see.
So, a belated, undead tip o' the brain to George Romero. Happy birthday, George!
And, in celebration of his birthday, here's a little zombie trivia for all you ghouls out there.
Oh, and here's a question for anyone, 'cause I really don't know. What's the difference between a ghoul and zombie. I'd like to know. Leave comments, please.
1. Zombies are tough. Usually it takes a blow or shot to the head to get rid of 'em.
2. If surrounded by a batch of zombies, try shuffling and walking slowly. That may buy you some time.
3. During zombie outbreaks, avoid malls. Zombies love malls.
4. How do you know if you're a zombie? You've developed a sudden craving for scrambled eggs and brains. Without the scrambled eggs.
Oh, and one final note. In last night's post, I said that the role of Dr. Moreau was Charles Laughton's first U.S. starring role. It was actually his second, having appeared in a film titled Payment Deferred, released November 7th, 1932.
'til next time... Adios.
He reminds of Stan Lee a bit, but younger, and is the undisputed father of people-munchin’ zombies, beginning with his classic, Night of the Living Dead in 1968, shot on a budget of somewhere around $100,000.
I’ve only seen two or three of his Dead series. I know Night of the Living Dead had slow zombies. Wonder if he sped ‘em up later on? Perhaps he knows what got them moving so fast in later years.
His most recent film, a documentary titled Into the Dark: Exploring the Horror Film, is supposedly in post-production, with Mr. Romero as executive producer. This one I definitely want to see.
So, a belated, undead tip o' the brain to George Romero. Happy birthday, George!
And, in celebration of his birthday, here's a little zombie trivia for all you ghouls out there.
Oh, and here's a question for anyone, 'cause I really don't know. What's the difference between a ghoul and zombie. I'd like to know. Leave comments, please.
1. Zombies are tough. Usually it takes a blow or shot to the head to get rid of 'em.
2. If surrounded by a batch of zombies, try shuffling and walking slowly. That may buy you some time.
3. During zombie outbreaks, avoid malls. Zombies love malls.
4. How do you know if you're a zombie? You've developed a sudden craving for scrambled eggs and brains. Without the scrambled eggs.
Oh, and one final note. In last night's post, I said that the role of Dr. Moreau was Charles Laughton's first U.S. starring role. It was actually his second, having appeared in a film titled Payment Deferred, released November 7th, 1932.
'til next time... Adios.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Classic Horror Film Club
I love watching our old
classic horror films. Some are creepy, or comical, mysterious, or
exciting. Many are engrossing. Some are average. But, last night’s
movie, The Island of Lost Souls, did something to and for all of us
there. And, a record turnout it was. 20 souls all gathered together
to watch this incredibly eerie, frightening, disturbing, and
entertaining film.
Like a good Hitchcock film, Island did its best work all inside our heads. Implication, suggestion, undertones. Like seeing something out of the corner of your eye. Shot in glorious black-and-white, we never saw any blood that I can recall, although the suggestion was always there. Like a great radio drama, they used sound to maximum advantage. Sounds of human/animal cries shattered my nerves.
But, it’s the story and the actors that brought everything home. Two very fine actors, Charles Laughton, in his first starring role in the U.S.; and, Bela Lugosi, who was at his peak in the U. S. of A., cranking out great films for Universal. It was Laughton’s performance, though, that dominated everything. He was proof that to be frightening you don’t need a loud voice or menacing features.
Island starts off by keeping us off-balance. A supply ship rescues a man from the sea. The captain, a mean drunk of a man, is taking a Noah’s ark collection of animals to some unknown destination. Later we find that destination is to Dr. Moreau's hidden island. And, we see that something about taking those animals to Moreau bothers the captain.
This is not his first trip to the island. And, here is the captain, bothered by whatever the good doctor is involved in. This brutal man who throws the rescued Parker onto the small boat carrying supplies and animals to Moreau’s island, ultimately stranding him on Moreau's island.
So, I’m thinking, here’s this captain, a beast of a man (pun intended), who strands a man that he just rescued. And, if the captain is bothered by whatever Moreau is up to, then how much worse is Moreau himself?
Then, we meet Dr. Moreau. A seemingly cultured man who spoke softly and elegantly. He sipped brandy while strange sounds sliced the night.
Island feels like a mix of Frankenstein (don’t mess with Mother Nature) and Animal Farm (“Four legs bad, two legs good”), both advising is in their own ways to leave well enough alone, and “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. We as two-legged critters tend to think of ourselves as the final word. However, as Dr. Moreau demonstrated, sometimes we’re the monsters, sometimes we’re the beasts.
This film influenced many writers and musicians in the years after its initial release. Think back the the early 80’s, and the New Wave band Devo. What was one of their lines? “Are we not men?”, a line spoken often by Bela Lugosi’s character, Sayer of the Law. Then, Oingo Boingo in their Good for Your Soul album, sang “What is the Law? No spill blood!” And, the list goes on. When Van Halen performed their song “House of Pain” (referring to Moreau’s House of Pain where he performed his gruesome off-screen (fortunately) surgery on the poor creatures), their original version of the song contained lyrics that directly linked to the film.
As I was writing this, I realized, too, that the filmmakers didn’t attempt to show any transformations, even when Lota, the Panther Woman, began her slow change back to her wild state. They only showed the creatures in whatever state or condition they happened to be in at the time. I think they rightly figured that any kind of transformation sequence might cheapen the effect. As it was, the makeup was perfect.
'til
next time... Adios.
Like a good Hitchcock film, Island did its best work all inside our heads. Implication, suggestion, undertones. Like seeing something out of the corner of your eye. Shot in glorious black-and-white, we never saw any blood that I can recall, although the suggestion was always there. Like a great radio drama, they used sound to maximum advantage. Sounds of human/animal cries shattered my nerves.
But, it’s the story and the actors that brought everything home. Two very fine actors, Charles Laughton, in his first starring role in the U.S.; and, Bela Lugosi, who was at his peak in the U. S. of A., cranking out great films for Universal. It was Laughton’s performance, though, that dominated everything. He was proof that to be frightening you don’t need a loud voice or menacing features.
Island starts off by keeping us off-balance. A supply ship rescues a man from the sea. The captain, a mean drunk of a man, is taking a Noah’s ark collection of animals to some unknown destination. Later we find that destination is to Dr. Moreau's hidden island. And, we see that something about taking those animals to Moreau bothers the captain.
This is not his first trip to the island. And, here is the captain, bothered by whatever the good doctor is involved in. This brutal man who throws the rescued Parker onto the small boat carrying supplies and animals to Moreau’s island, ultimately stranding him on Moreau's island.
So, I’m thinking, here’s this captain, a beast of a man (pun intended), who strands a man that he just rescued. And, if the captain is bothered by whatever Moreau is up to, then how much worse is Moreau himself?
Then, we meet Dr. Moreau. A seemingly cultured man who spoke softly and elegantly. He sipped brandy while strange sounds sliced the night.
Island feels like a mix of Frankenstein (don’t mess with Mother Nature) and Animal Farm (“Four legs bad, two legs good”), both advising is in their own ways to leave well enough alone, and “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. We as two-legged critters tend to think of ourselves as the final word. However, as Dr. Moreau demonstrated, sometimes we’re the monsters, sometimes we’re the beasts.
This film influenced many writers and musicians in the years after its initial release. Think back the the early 80’s, and the New Wave band Devo. What was one of their lines? “Are we not men?”, a line spoken often by Bela Lugosi’s character, Sayer of the Law. Then, Oingo Boingo in their Good for Your Soul album, sang “What is the Law? No spill blood!” And, the list goes on. When Van Halen performed their song “House of Pain” (referring to Moreau’s House of Pain where he performed his gruesome off-screen (fortunately) surgery on the poor creatures), their original version of the song contained lyrics that directly linked to the film.
As I was writing this, I realized, too, that the filmmakers didn’t attempt to show any transformations, even when Lota, the Panther Woman, began her slow change back to her wild state. They only showed the creatures in whatever state or condition they happened to be in at the time. I think they rightly figured that any kind of transformation sequence might cheapen the effect. As it was, the makeup was perfect.
I'm
going to have to write more later about this major film. Not done
yet. More to say.
But,
before I close for the eve, many thanks to Heather and Veronica at
the Tates Creek Library for making last night's movie possible. And,
thanks to all who attended last night. Our band of Scoobies is
growing.
Check out our group right here:
Monday, February 4, 2013
The Un-learning Channel
Once upon a time, The Learning Channel had a cool logo – a
black-and-white image of a tree, perhaps suggesting the “… tree
of knowledge”. They billed themselves as “The smart choice on
cable”.
So, what happened? Now, I'm not one to point fingers (poke, poke), but when they first cranked up as a public TV station, formed by NASA (yes, the actual NASA), they had educational shows like:
Learn to Read, a program to help adults learn to read.
History programs such as Battles That Changed the World.
Paleoworld, which aired from 1994 to 1997, a 50-episode documentary series about dinosaurs.
And, preschool educational shows, such as Ready, Set, Learn! in 1992.
Then, something happened, and reality set in.
Reality shows, that is. The mid-90’s brought us Trauma: Life in the ER, sensationalist TV thinly disguised as a medical show. I mean, heck, if it has medical-sounding terms like ‘trauma’ and ‘ER’, surely it’ll be educational, right?
Then came Wedding Story and Baby Story. And, now, oh, let's see. What say I do a quick check right now of the ol' TLC schedule (they're not calling themselves The Learning Channel now):
There's Cake Boss: Next Great Baker. And, it looks like we have a mini-marathon of cake bosses.
Tomorrow morning we have 19 Kids and Counting, then later is Make Room for Multiples".
But, for some really good educational programming, tomorrow morning at 10 and 10:30 AM we have back-to-back episodes of I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant.
Say, have you heard the one about a station that showed cool music videos and... stop me if you've heard this one.
'til next time... Adios.
So, what happened? Now, I'm not one to point fingers (poke, poke), but when they first cranked up as a public TV station, formed by NASA (yes, the actual NASA), they had educational shows like:
Learn to Read, a program to help adults learn to read.
History programs such as Battles That Changed the World.
Paleoworld, which aired from 1994 to 1997, a 50-episode documentary series about dinosaurs.
And, preschool educational shows, such as Ready, Set, Learn! in 1992.
Then, something happened, and reality set in.
Reality shows, that is. The mid-90’s brought us Trauma: Life in the ER, sensationalist TV thinly disguised as a medical show. I mean, heck, if it has medical-sounding terms like ‘trauma’ and ‘ER’, surely it’ll be educational, right?
Then came Wedding Story and Baby Story. And, now, oh, let's see. What say I do a quick check right now of the ol' TLC schedule (they're not calling themselves The Learning Channel now):
There's Cake Boss: Next Great Baker. And, it looks like we have a mini-marathon of cake bosses.
Tomorrow morning we have 19 Kids and Counting, then later is Make Room for Multiples".
But, for some really good educational programming, tomorrow morning at 10 and 10:30 AM we have back-to-back episodes of I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant.
Say, have you heard the one about a station that showed cool music videos and... stop me if you've heard this one.
'til next time... Adios.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
3-D or Not 3-D, That is the Question
Thought I'd check before I run out on
that tree limb again. Merriam-Webster (the online version -- yeah, I
suppose if I wanted to do it right, I'd go to my actual paper
dictionary) defines a printer as:
'til next time... Adios.
a : a
person engaged in printing.
b : a
device used for printing; especially :
a machine for printing from photographic negatives.
c : a
device (as an ink-jet printer) that produces printout.
My question is, if a machine pops out
an object, but not something with a picture or text on it, is that
device a printer? Moot point now, I suppose.
So, looks like we need to stretch
another word, as there's a new product called a 3-D printer.
Basically, it takes a model of an object, say, for example, a plastic
door handle for your car (the model is represented mathematically by
all sorts of equations and stuff), sends it to this thing called a
3-D printer (it's really just a super-fancy mold), and it spits out a
brand new door handle.
Now, pardon my dinosaurish-ness again,
but, to me, if you're spewing out a physical object like a door
handle, that's not printing, but, okay, I'll play along.
So, anyway, this will be a new
manufacturing tool. And, guess what one of the first applications
will be? Pez dispensers. But not just any old Pez dispensers, no
sirree. They'll use this fancy new technology to make a model of
your head, and there you'll be, immortalized. On a Pez dispenser.
Is this a great country, or what?
I can hardly wait 'til we get Star
Trek-style transporters. Wonder what the first thing is we'll
teleport?
You want fries with that?
'til next time... Adios.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
More Monkey Business
Got curious a few minutes ago, and
that's always dangerous. So, I ventured off the path of finding
monkey movies and decided I'd take a stroll through what sort of
monkey business is playing on the tube. Here goes:
Looks like BBC America is monkeying
around with some monkey and ape shows. First up, we have a show
called All About Apes coming on BBCAM 8 AM to 9 AM on 2/3/13. And,
it is, aptly enough, all about apes. Looks like a documentary on the
ape family. Wonder if I'll recognize anyone?
Next we have Rise of the Planet of the
Apes (2011), which I haven't seen yet, coming up this Saturday on one of the
HBO channels from 2:10 to 4 PM. The apes take revenge for all the
testing we've done on them. Not to mention all those years spent
with organ grinders.
Then, we have the companion piece to
All About Apes on BBCAM from 9 to 10 AM, also on 2/3/13.
Hmm, this sounds.... odd. Dana Carvey
has a show called Dana Carvey: Squatting Monkeys (?) this Saturday,
from 12 to 1 PM, on another of the HBO channels. With a title like
that...
But, the title I like the best is My
Child is a Monkey (Hey, I resemble that remark!), on the WILD
channel, 2/15/13, from 5 to 6 PM, all about people who adopt monkeys
as pets, treating them as though they were children, and calling them
"monkids". Now, that's just plain weird. It's not like
they're cats. I mean, monkeys can dress themselves. But, now, our
cats, we spend a lot of time shopping for their little clothes, and
getting their gourmet foods, and.... uh, well, uh... never mind.
Well, enough monkey business for now.
I'll get back on track soon and down to the serious business of
monkey movies again. You know, important stuff.
And, remember, folks, leave your comments on my blog about your favorite monkey movies.
'til next time... Adios.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Monkeys and Other People
Everyone loves monkeys, right? And, what better than monkey
movies? Problem is, I can’t find a really good list. So, I’m
starting it right here. It’s gonna take some time to compile, but,
don’t worry, I’ll alternate by writing non-monkey posts, too. So,
here we go.
And, I'm gonna ask for your help. Anyone reading my blog, if you have a monkey movie you love, want to see, or plan on making, post a comment, please. At some point, down the road, I'll have everyone vote on their favorites.
One qualification, though. I want funny monkeys, or action-packed monkeys, or scary monkeys. And, all fiction, please. I don't want any where I'm gonna get all depressed. I love monkeys and I want this to be a fun post. Let's keep it light.
King Kong (1933) – Yep, let’s pull out the big guns first by featuring a big monkey. I still love this one and it's perhaps my favorite. The story is pure "beauty-and-the-beast", and Kong is as cool as they get.
Planet of the Apes (1968). The original, of course, with Charlton “Get your hands off me…” Heston. My second favorite. No comparison to the other one, which is:
Planet of the Apes (2001). I thought Mark Wahlberg could've done better, though I really liked Tim Roth. Wasn't Mark's fault. I didn't think much of the script in this one.
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Not really a monkey film as the apes in their pre-evolving state were only featured for a short time. But, they were great costumes, and the actors in the costumes truly moved apelike. Yeah, I'm cheating here, but ya gotta love the monkeys here. It's when they start evolving, learning how to use tools, and knock each other over the head, that the trouble starts.
Okay, everyone else's turn now. Let's get your monkey comments in.
'til next time... Adios.
And, I'm gonna ask for your help. Anyone reading my blog, if you have a monkey movie you love, want to see, or plan on making, post a comment, please. At some point, down the road, I'll have everyone vote on their favorites.
One qualification, though. I want funny monkeys, or action-packed monkeys, or scary monkeys. And, all fiction, please. I don't want any where I'm gonna get all depressed. I love monkeys and I want this to be a fun post. Let's keep it light.
King Kong (1933) – Yep, let’s pull out the big guns first by featuring a big monkey. I still love this one and it's perhaps my favorite. The story is pure "beauty-and-the-beast", and Kong is as cool as they get.
Planet of the Apes (1968). The original, of course, with Charlton “Get your hands off me…” Heston. My second favorite. No comparison to the other one, which is:
Planet of the Apes (2001). I thought Mark Wahlberg could've done better, though I really liked Tim Roth. Wasn't Mark's fault. I didn't think much of the script in this one.
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Not really a monkey film as the apes in their pre-evolving state were only featured for a short time. But, they were great costumes, and the actors in the costumes truly moved apelike. Yeah, I'm cheating here, but ya gotta love the monkeys here. It's when they start evolving, learning how to use tools, and knock each other over the head, that the trouble starts.
Okay, everyone else's turn now. Let's get your monkey comments in.
'til next time... Adios.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Star Wars Numero Seven
I saw where J. J. Abrams, one of the recent wunderkinds, will sit
in the captain’s chair for the next Star Wars movie. According to
the film news mill, since Disney bought Lucasfilm, the next three
films in the saga will finally emerge. The long lost dream from back
in ’77 of a 9-part series. These next three will supposedly take
off some time (haven’t heard yet how many years) after Return of
the Jedi. From what I’ve heard, we’ll see Luke as a Jedi master,
Leia, too, perhaps, and Han and Leia with little Jedi juniors running
around.
I do have some questions, though. Abrams’ successes mostly concern him as a producer. He’s had some success as a director, especially with Super 8 (2011) and Star Trek (2009). Much as I loved the new Star Trek, he could’ve tightened it up (at least he didn't call it Star Trek: The Second Motion Picture). Loved the new batch of actors, great action sequences, the storyline, well, I always have trouble when we get the whole time loop thing in there. Spock Old and Spock Young, both existing at the same time? Wouldn’t that do something bad to the space-time continuum? Ah, well, it was still a really good film. And, I hope J. J. can pull off Star Wars part Seven. Good thing is, maybe he can keep check on Mr. Lucas and keep him from creating the mess he made with Star Wars One, Two, and Three.
I'm hopeful, though. Abrams had a truly tough job with firing back up the Star Trek franchise, which had been dying on the vine for a long while. What I hope is that he brings back to Star Wars a simple, powerful story, like in the original Star Wars, throwing in some of the darkness of Empire and Return. So, let's see what he does. First things first, though. Don't just call it Star Wars: Episode VII.
I do have some questions, though. Abrams’ successes mostly concern him as a producer. He’s had some success as a director, especially with Super 8 (2011) and Star Trek (2009). Much as I loved the new Star Trek, he could’ve tightened it up (at least he didn't call it Star Trek: The Second Motion Picture). Loved the new batch of actors, great action sequences, the storyline, well, I always have trouble when we get the whole time loop thing in there. Spock Old and Spock Young, both existing at the same time? Wouldn’t that do something bad to the space-time continuum? Ah, well, it was still a really good film. And, I hope J. J. can pull off Star Wars part Seven. Good thing is, maybe he can keep check on Mr. Lucas and keep him from creating the mess he made with Star Wars One, Two, and Three.
I'm hopeful, though. Abrams had a truly tough job with firing back up the Star Trek franchise, which had been dying on the vine for a long while. What I hope is that he brings back to Star Wars a simple, powerful story, like in the original Star Wars, throwing in some of the darkness of Empire and Return. So, let's see what he does. First things first, though. Don't just call it Star Wars: Episode VII.
'til next time... Adios.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Waaa! Ricky!
Where have all the funny ladies gone?
There's a great series on KET called Pioneers of Television that
reaches back to the earliest days, even before I was around, and
shows the origins of sitcoms, the soaps, kids' shows, and cop shows,
just to name a few. The one we watched the other night was titled
"Funny Ladies".
They listed most all my favorites,
although they left out some. But, for an hour-long show, I think
they did a good job of including some of the powerhouses -- Lucille
Ball, Phyllis Diller, Carol Burnett, Moms Mabley (anyone remember
her? You pretty much have to be a Boomer to remember Moms.), Betty
White, Mary Tyler Moore, and Joan Rivers. Some of them, especially
Phyllis Diller and Joan Rivers, really pushed the envelope, going
where no female comic had gone before.
What was interesting was hearing how
they got started. Some started off in completely different
entertainment career choices than what they ended up in. Carol
Burnett started off trying to sing on Broadway; Mary Tyler Moore was
a dancer prior to The Dick Van Dyke Show, and had never done comedy.
Joan Rivers did more dramatic work in the beginning. Others, like
Lucille Ball, started off with a long history of physical comedy,
honing her craft with everyone from the Marx Brothers to The Three
Stooges.
Check out local times and listings for
upcoming Pioneers of Television episodes at:
'til next time... Adios.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
What a Disaster
I'm currently reading a thorough book
on disaster films titled, appropriately, "Disaster Movies" by Glenn Kay and Michael Rose.
The disaster movie category is yet another genre, or perhaps,
sub-genre, of films, the big genre being 'action/adventure'. And,
I'm gonna run with scissors here and produce a sub-sub-genre called
'schlocky-fun disaster movies'.
Here's why. Serious disaster films,
which do exist (think A Night to Remember (1958), the REAL movie
about the Titanic, an excellent film), stand apart from the fun
disaster flicks. And, like many truly great movies, defy genre.
Slapping a movie in a specific genre sometimes sets it up as a
certain type, almost a cliche, occasionally an unintentional spoof of
itself. So, my schlocky-fun disaster movies, of which there are a
bazillion (Meteor (1979), The Towering Inferno (1974), 2012 (2009)), fit neatly in their
boxes, but can't be taken seriously.
At any rate, the book is a good read,
and I'm learning the titles of several potentially-hysterical
disastrous films that I'll need to watch and throw on my blog.
'til next time... Adios.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The Director Who Blew Himself Up
I see so many movies where I can predict what comes next. Oh, he
did that, so she’ll do that, and then they shoot this guy, etc. Not
so with Quentin Tarantino’s latest genre-buster, Django Unchained (2012).
Here, anything can happen. With the ideal combo of great writing,
acting, directing, and cinematography, literally, I could not tell
you what would happen next. And, that’s one of the reasons this
movie is so great and so much fun.
This is a revenge movie. I’m finally getting the idea that Quentin does pretty much all revenge. At least the few movies I’ve seen of his. Admittedly, I’ve only seen a handful, and those most recent, including the Kill Bill duology (2003 and 2004), Inglourious Basterds (2009), and now Django Unchained. I saw Pulp Fiction (1994) when it first came out and didn’t care for it, so I probably need to take another look at it, especially now that I “get” Tarantino. Maybe I still won’t like it, I don’t know, but I need to give it another watch.
We start off somewhere in Texas, head up to Tennessee, then finally down to Mississippi, where we spend most of the movie. So, since this takes place in the South, is it a Southern?
Blaxploitation? Sure. Spaghetti Western. Check. But, this film is genreless. Basically, though, it starts off showing a group of slaves chained together, led on a brutal march by two slave traders. And, along comes this “dentist” driving a horse-drawn cart with a gigantic tooth on the top.
Okay, I've run out of time for tonight and I have a lot more to say about this film. More tomorrow.
'til next time... Adios.
This is a revenge movie. I’m finally getting the idea that Quentin does pretty much all revenge. At least the few movies I’ve seen of his. Admittedly, I’ve only seen a handful, and those most recent, including the Kill Bill duology (2003 and 2004), Inglourious Basterds (2009), and now Django Unchained. I saw Pulp Fiction (1994) when it first came out and didn’t care for it, so I probably need to take another look at it, especially now that I “get” Tarantino. Maybe I still won’t like it, I don’t know, but I need to give it another watch.
We start off somewhere in Texas, head up to Tennessee, then finally down to Mississippi, where we spend most of the movie. So, since this takes place in the South, is it a Southern?
Blaxploitation? Sure. Spaghetti Western. Check. But, this film is genreless. Basically, though, it starts off showing a group of slaves chained together, led on a brutal march by two slave traders. And, along comes this “dentist” driving a horse-drawn cart with a gigantic tooth on the top.
Okay, I've run out of time for tonight and I have a lot more to say about this film. More tomorrow.
'til next time... Adios.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
An Evening of Art
What a fantastic night this past
Friday, January 18th, at the Weber Gallery, a part of Louisville's
Council on Developmental Disabilities. From 5:30 to 9 that night,
the gallery hosted a reception for a new art exhibit, Women Work. My
wife, Wendy Currier (Wendy Currier is also Wendy Zumwalt), displayed
8 of her pen and ink drawings, along with several other women
artists.
http://www.councilondd.org/?page_id=379
'til next time... Adios.
A wonderfully diverse selection of work
demonstrating women, strong women, in various roles. The subject
matter was as diverse as the media -- sculpture, mixed media,
pottery, photography, oils and acrylics, all showing women in
powerful roles and occupations. The reception was well-attended,
with plenty of good food and drinks for all.
The exhibit will stay up until March
22nd. For more information, contact Carol Mueller at the Weber
Gallery at 502-584-1239.
Check out their web site, too:
http://www.councilondd.org/?page_id=379
'til next time... Adios.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)